Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1621-1628, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-595767

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No reports describe falsepositive reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for novel coronavirus in preoperative screening. METHODS: Preoperative patients had one or two nasopharyngeal swabs, depending on low or high risk of viral transmission. Positive tests were repeated. RESULTS: Forty-three of 52 patients required two or more preoperative tests. Four (9.3%) had discrepant results (positive/negative). One of these left the coronavirus disease (COVID) unit against medical advice despite an orbital abscess, with unknown true disease status. The remaining 3 of 42 (7.1%) had negative repeat RT-PCR. Although ultimately considered falsepositives, one was sent to a COVID unit postoperatively and two had urgent surgery delayed. Assuming negative repeat RT-PCR, clear chest imaging, and lack of subsequent symptoms represent the "gold standard," RT-PCR specificity was 0.97. CONCLUSIONS: If false positives are suspected, we recommend computed tomography (CT) of the chest and repeat RT-PCR. Validated serum immunoglobulin testing may ultimately prove useful.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/genetics , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , False Positive Reactions , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Emergencies , Female , Florida/epidemiology , Humans , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharynx/virology , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Preoperative Care , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
2.
Head Neck ; 42(7): 1448-1453, 2020 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-155352

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has raised controversies regarding safe and effective care of patients with head and neck cancer. It is unknown how much the pandemic has changed surgeon practice. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to head and neck surgeons assessing opinions related to treatment and concerns for the safety of patients, self, family, and staff. RESULTS: A total of 88 head and neck surgeons responded during the study period. Surgeons continued to recommend primary surgical treatment for oral cavity cancers. Respondents were more likely to consider nonsurgical therapy for patients with early glottic cancers and HPV-mediated oropharynx cancer. Surgeons were least likely to be concerned for their own health and safety and had the greatest concern for their resident trainees. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights differences in the willingness of head and neck surgeons to delay surgery or alter plans during times when hospital resources are scarce and risk is high.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Pandemics/statistics & numerical data , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Surgical Oncology/organization & administration , Surveys and Questionnaires , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Female , Head and Neck Neoplasms/epidemiology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/pathology , Humans , Infection Control/organization & administration , Male , Occupational Health , Pandemics/prevention & control , Patient Safety , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Risk Management , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Time-to-Treatment/statistics & numerical data , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL